Actually, from an engineering standpoint (old civil bridge designing backgound) I would drill and pier to bedrock close to the hull down both sides (at areas that TOM recommends) and then lift the Bat on cross beams (similar to U-505) and then set adjoining contoured cross beams on the tops of the piers and set her down on them. These cross beams would have shouldered and crossed wrist pins similar to bridge decking that would allow growth of the BAT fore and aft with temperature change. I believe this is one of the flaws with DRUM. As it grows and shrinks with temperature, the poured in place "saddles" fit, then don't and the rubber can't compensate for it. So, weight is distributed to the different piers as it moves back and forth. Some are getting tremendous weight while others don't and then back again. If done correctly, rubber could be used on the contoured cross beams. If one was really clever a wishbone joint could be put at one end of the beam that would allow hydraulic lowering enough for removal of each cross beam to maintain the hull, replace the rubber and cross beams as they age/wear. If we had a weight distribution chart per foot of boat (I bet R Pekelney has one somewhere, he has everything) this would be an easy floating-deck statics problem. Once the boat is on her stage, you fill in the pond area with dirt to bring it to the current shack, er, museum building 's flood plane elevation and decide from there. I like her being outside. If in, the working scopes would be useless. Once we get the trees down, the view from the river and turnpike would be spectacular. In our world (land locked) once this is sealed correctly and protected, there is no reason why she can't last out there "forever". 100 plus year old houses made of wood are everywhere.
They moved (drove) U-505 wih 144 tires on 6 total cross beams. U-505 is 60 feet shorter and 373 tons lighter but, thats small potatoes in the concept scheme.
Just some thoughts......